This gallery contains 10 photos.
This gallery contains 10 photos.
Recently when working through the backlog of film in the fridge, i managed to develop a roll that had obviously been nowhere near a camera. Oops. So professional.
Perhaps to balance that out there was also a roll that had been through the XPan at least twice, and perhaps three times, in London (once in August 2016, again in August 2017), Hamburg, and Nagano. The results are, to say the least, chaotic.
Also in this batch of films was a roll of Ilford SFX 200 shots of my neighbours water damaged ceiling. Obviously under-exposed and consequently rather “moody”. It’s all so much water under the bridge, etc.
It’s that time again. I’m trying to convince myself that it’s worth putting my photography on walls again. For the loooooongest time i’m wanted to do something “spectacular” (read: “stupid”) with the ‘Water under the Bridge” series.
Before leaving Japan i took a bunch of these shots on Acros and developed them with Microfine, the Fujifilm developer for smooth grain… probably now discontinued.
The results never did much for me, had trouble getting clean scans, which were never really big enough to consider printing at the size at which it seems likely that these shots would work.
Today as part of my effort to get back on track i scanned the shot to the right. That one is 12000×32000 pixels, printed at 300dpi it would stand 2.7m tall and 93cm wide…
What i don’t really know is what that’s going to look like on paper… looking at that little version over there (40 times smaller than the full scan!) it sure look sharp / in focus / detailed, but looking at the pixels 1:1 it’s not so obvious.
Despite being shot on a tripod, with a cable release, there is a lot that can go wrong. And despite the XPan lenses, whether i manager to nail the focus, and get the film perfectly parallel to the wall… who knows.
2.7m is a little larger than i’d anticipated. Down sampling it down to a size where it could be just 2m might help a little (in terms of making it practical to hang). Which is all very well, but how do i go about getting someone to do test prints for a couple of places in the image.
Oh, and can i find a few more that are similarly interesting / sharp? Still think it’d look spectacular hung one of those unpainted concrete gallery walls that are all the rage in Tokyo…
If you’ve ever printed on this scale and would care to share any wisdom it would be much appreciated!
Update: first suggestion, from @Tug, is C Type prints at Metro
It’s a little disturbing to think about how many of these shots i must have taken… not even sure that they that interesting this wide. Of course, i’ll end up taking more next time i’m back in Tokyo.
Every now and then, i’ll look at one of these kinds of shots as i’m paging through “past glories” and suddenly stop, wondering ‘what on earth… ohhh! clever!’. This was one of those.
Oh, and look at the light that is parallel to the top of the frame. Not a very smart way to try to get things level / square. Live and learn.
A view into one the several cones in Jean Nouvel’s Galeries Lafayette in Berlin. One of the places that i need to spend more time exploring. If i understand correctly, there are other glass cones that drop down into the underground parking… surely that has to look cool!
This is the seventh! It was actually easier than i thought… perhaps i’ll post a few more. Have found that the easiest way to get this done is spend an evening or a Sunday morning looking through shots, selecting what might work, and then posting them all as a bunch, but scheduled to go live one a day.
And so few where they should be! It’s always a struggle in these busy shots to keep the right things vertical (this one is “fixed”) but once you start tweaking there is always another line that you would prefer not to be there, or which would look better vertical…