More adverts for the void…
Required context. If i remember correctly, that shot of Sean’s was taken with my 40mm Distagon on one of our “lens swaps”. It’s all connected… eventually.
Look what turned up in the post this week, right after me posting about it a few days ago.
Now for 7 days of unseen vertical XPan shots… not sure if this is going to work. Vertical XPan can end up looking a little weird, but that doesn’t appear to have stopped me occassionally giving it a whirl!
You can tell it’s taken in Hamburg by the honking great big water stain up at the top. Oops.
It seemed like a good idea to stick the camera on a tripod and attempt to film a few minutes of the new year fireworks. The whole of the evening is punctuated with bangs and screeches, and whistles. However, a few minutes before midnight it really begins in earnest.
Unfortunately my video making skills are… lacking. It’s not in focus, the sound is terrible, and it needed to be shot at a lower ISO. All of which adds up to it not really reproducing the intensity of the experience. Next year, at a minimum, i’ll need to: get it in focus; shoot a few samples to check for noise; get a microphone with one of those furry hats to reduce the wind noise. I’d guess that an external microphone would actually make the biggest difference to how it works out. That and getting up on the roof… lets see how that goes (in a year)!
Edit: figured a little background music and a fade-out wouldn’t hurt. Just goes to show how wrong you can be! There is a copy of something called iMovie HD on my hard disk, presumably from back when Apple was giving such junk away – fuck knows they wouldn’t have been able to sell it… It got the job done, but it was, to say the least, a bit of a traumatic software experience. Presumably things have improved?
A long and interesting piece in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists on the nuclear phase out in Germany. Along with being a good summary of the what, when, where, who, and why, there is this:
What is remarkable about these early events is that the opposition to the Brokdorf and the Wyhl projects did not explicitly target nuclear power per se, or even focus on particular issues of nuclear power, such as reactor safety or waste disposal (Radkau, 1983: 458). Instead, the early opposition movement largely developed in response to the nontransparent and authoritarian style in which the federal government pursued its big-industry projects, exemplified by excessive use of police force.
Which should probably have parallels in Japan, not so much with excessive use of force, japanese police tactics are more subtle, and one might say insiduous, but the “nontransparent and authoritarian” part is spot on.
It is clear at this point that nuclear is not a cheap, risk free, ‘too cheap to meter’ supply of energy, and the discussion really needs to move on to why national governments are so enthralled with the interests that would like to pretend otherwise.
ps. arrived back from Japan last weekend, but my brain has only just turned up. It seems to be taking longer and longer for it to make the journey across Siberia…