Mound

Others have called it phallic… maybe we’re seeing what we want to see?

6 thoughts on “Mound”

uchujin on September 21, 2009 at 3:09 pm said:

Definitely more ‘moundy’ (sic) now you point it out 😉

Reply ↓
Laura on September 21, 2009 at 11:46 pm said:

oh, one could have a lot of fun with this…(every pun intended)

yes, definitely, very mound-ish and definitely a new take on the Shinjuku Gherkin…

does it signify that the very rectilinear object penetrating up from below is not nearly long enough to reach even half the way…? just askin’…
😉

Reply ↓
- itllallendintears on September 22, 2009 at 9:24 am said:
  
  haha. well, i suppose that shows that it’s easy to take that metaphor too far! very good 🙂
  
  Reply ↓
unsong on September 27, 2009 at 7:18 pm said:

i’ll just say “mons pubis” and leave it there.

Reply ↓
- itllallendintears on September 28, 2009 at 9:58 am said:
  
  by jove! i do believe you’ve got it…
  
  Reply ↓
unsong on September 28, 2009 at 5:10 pm said:

i felt the “bleedin’ obvious” needed stating. to see the image as a penile one seems overly… homocentric. something to do with projection?

Reply ↓