Mound Posted on 2009-09-21 by itllallendintears Others have called it phallic… maybe we’re seeing what we want to see? Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:Like Loading... Related
oh, one could have a lot of fun with this…(every pun intended) yes, definitely, very mound-ish and definitely a new take on the Shinjuku Gherkin… does it signify that the very rectilinear object penetrating up from below is not nearly long enough to reach even half the way…? just askin’… 😉 Reply ↓
haha. well, i suppose that shows that it’s easy to take that metaphor too far! very good 🙂 Reply ↓
i felt the “bleedin’ obvious” needed stating. to see the image as a penile one seems overly… homocentric. something to do with projection? Reply ↓
Definitely more ‘moundy’ (sic) now you point it out 😉
oh, one could have a lot of fun with this…(every pun intended)
yes, definitely, very mound-ish and definitely a new take on the Shinjuku Gherkin…
does it signify that the very rectilinear object penetrating up from below is not nearly long enough to reach even half the way…? just askin’…
😉
haha. well, i suppose that shows that it’s easy to take that metaphor too far! very good 🙂
i’ll just say “mons pubis” and leave it there.
by jove! i do believe you’ve got it…
i felt the “bleedin’ obvious” needed stating. to see the image as a penile one seems overly… homocentric. something to do with projection?